On 11/10/14 4:33 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 21:25:32 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
I was perusing a PR for phobos where std/range.d was split into
submodules and std/range.d was moved to std/range/package.d
I was wondering why a package module had to be called "package.d"
i
On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 21:25:32 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
I was perusing a PR for phobos where std/range.d was split into
submodules and std/range.d was moved to std/range/package.d
I was wondering why a package module had to be called
"package.d" instead of just being the package na
I was perusing a PR for phobos where std/range.d was split into
submodules and std/range.d was moved to std/range/package.d
I was wondering why a package module had to be called "package.d"
instead of just being the package name. For example, instead of
moving std/range.d to std/range/package