The problem is that it seems that when one has a parameterized
type, you must completely specify the parameters when using
Algebraic,
Algebraic!(T, Vector!int, Vector!(double, 3), Vector!(double, 3),
...)[] data;
to be able to encapsulate an Algebraic on Vector(as a collection
of all fixed
I'm trying to create a vector of vectors(more general than
vectors or matrices).
The idea is that a Vector can contain another Vector or another
type. Vector can be specified to be fixed in length or dynamic
for efficiency. Vector!(T, N) creates a vector of leaf type T and
length N. If N = si
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 14:57:33 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
You can make the tree store a *pointer* to a tree though.
That's the traditional way to do it and it works here too.
Oh, alright. I changed Tree to be a class instead of a struct and
it seems to work just fine now. Thanks a lot!
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 14:53:13 UTC, Kamil Koczurek wrote:
Can I somehow fix this, or is my approach inherently flawed?
A tree there would be storing a copy of a tree which is storing a
copy of a tree... where would it end?
You can make the tree store a *pointer* to a tree though. That's
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a simple tree and this 3-liner was my
initial idea:
struct Tree(T) {
Algebraic!(Tree, T)[] content;
}
But it doesn't work and I get the following error message:
/.../variant.d(...): Error: struct `app.Tree` no size because of
forward reference
/.../variant.d(...)
