On Sunday, 3 January 2021 at 18:26:44 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
alias Matcher = Match function(Matcher[] matchers...);
but it errors as
recursive alias declaration
Preferrably I wanted a non-templated definition.
On Sunday, 3 January 2021 at 18:55:58 UTC, sighoya wrote:
```
alias matcherSignature(T:matcherSignature!T) = Matcher (T[]
matchers...);
```
Yet, it is right:
```
alias matcherSignature(T:matcherSignature!T) = Matcher
function(T[] matchers...);
```
But it didn't work likewise, you have t
On Sunday, 3 January 2021 at 18:49:40 UTC, sighoya wrote:
```
alias matcherSignature(T:matcherSignature!T) = T (T[]
matchers...);
```
Ahhh, I meant this:
```
alias matcherSignature(T:matcherSignature!T) = Matcher (T[]
matchers...);
``
I think we would require proper singleton types to m
On Sunday, 3 January 2021 at 18:26:44 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
I've tried
alias Matcher = Match function(Matcher[] matchers...);
but it errors as
recursive alias declaration
The closest thing can I think of is:
```
alias matcherSignature(T:matcherSignature!T) = T (T[]
matchers...);
How can I define a function type `Matcher` that takes an array of
`Matcher`s and returns an instance of a `struct Match` defined as
struct Match
{
@safe pure nothrow @nogc:
static Match zero()
{
return typeof(return)(0);
}
static Match none()
{
return typeof(r
