In 2.063.2, (T!int).stringof == "T!(int)". In current head, it's
"T!int".
Even (T!(int)).stringof == "T!int".
So is this a regression bug or a bugfix?
On Sunday, 22 September 2013 at 13:50:00 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
In 2.063.2, (T!int).stringof == "T!(int)". In current head,
it's "T!int".
Even (T!(int)).stringof == "T!int".
So is this a regression bug or a bugfix?
Added a ticket so it doesn't get lost:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.
On 2013-09-22 15:49, simendsjo wrote:
In 2.063.2, (T!int).stringof == "T!(int)". In current head, it's "T!int".
Even (T!(int)).stringof == "T!int".
So is this a regression bug or a bugfix?
Apparently you shouldn't rely on the format of .stringof. See the
comment the ones that follow:
http:/