On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 19:49:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:34:07PM +, Jon D via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 16:37:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
>On 2/14/16 10:22 PM, Jon D wrote:
>>Is there a way to reserve capacity in ass
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:34:07PM +, Jon D via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 16:37:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >On 2/14/16 10:22 PM, Jon D wrote:
> >>Is there a way to reserve capacity in associative arrays?
> >>[snip]
> >>The underlying implementation
On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 16:37:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/14/16 10:22 PM, Jon D wrote:
Is there a way to reserve capacity in associative arrays?
[snip]
The underlying implementation of associative arrays
appears to take an initial number of buckets, and there's
a private res
On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 17:05:11 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 16:37:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
There is not a public way to access these methods
unfortunately.
It would be a good addition to druntime I believe.
-Steve
After reading the topic i've ad
On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 16:37:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
There is not a public way to access these methods unfortunately.
It would be a good addition to druntime I believe.
Recently, I added a clear method to the AA, which does not
reduce capacity. So if you frequently build l
On 2/14/16 10:22 PM, Jon D wrote:
Is there a way to reserve capacity in associative arrays? In some
programs I've been writing I've been getting reasonable performance up
to about 10 million entries, but beyond that performance is impacted
considerably (say, 30 million or 50 million entries). GC
On Monday, 15 February 2016 at 05:29:23 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Monday, 15 February 2016 at 03:22:44 UTC, Jon D wrote:
Is there a way to reserve capacity in associative arrays?
[snip]
Maybe try using this: http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm
Thanks, I wasn't aware of this package. I'll give it
On Monday, 15 February 2016 at 03:22:44 UTC, Jon D wrote:
Is there a way to reserve capacity in associative arrays? In
some programs I've been writing I've been getting reasonable
performance up to about 10 million entries, but beyond that
performance is impacted considerably (say, 30 million o
Is there a way to reserve capacity in associative arrays? In some
programs I've been writing I've been getting reasonable
performance up to about 10 million entries, but beyond that
performance is impacted considerably (say, 30 million or 50
million entries). GC stats (via the "--DRT-gcopt=prof
