On 11/11/2011 23:23, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Ali Çehreli Wrote:
On 11/11/2011 01:42 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:10:12 -0500, Simon wrote:
On 11/11/2011 19:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:01:42 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The
Ali Ãehreli Wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 01:42 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:10:12 -0500, Simon wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/11/2011 19:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:01:42 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> There should be no bou
On 11/11/2011 01:42 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:10:12 -0500, Simon wrote:
On 11/11/2011 19:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:01:42 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
There should be no bounds error in any case, an empty slice is valid.
By "
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:10:12 -0500, Simon wrote:
On 11/11/2011 19:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:01:42 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
There should be no bounds error in any case, an empty slice is valid.
By "in any case" I meant in either debug or release mode.
On 11/11/2011 19:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:01:42 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
There should be no bounds error in any case, an empty slice is valid.
By "in any case" I meant in either debug or release mode.
-Steve
even when you index beyond the bounds of
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:01:42 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
There should be no bounds error in any case, an empty slice is valid.
By "in any case" I meant in either debug or release mode.
-Steve
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:29:17 -0500, Simon wrote:
On 11/11/2011 16:56, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.866.1321013026.24802.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:46:02 RenatoL wrote:
int[7] arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7];
writeln(
On 11/11/2011 16:56, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.866.1321013026.24802.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:46:02 RenatoL wrote:
int[7] arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7];
writeln(arr[$..$]);
this simply prints a newline... I expec
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.866.1321013026.24802.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
> On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:46:02 RenatoL wrote:
>> int[7] arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7];
>> writeln(arr[$..$]);
>>
>> this simply prints a newline... I expected a runtime error (or better
>>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:03:33 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:46:02 RenatoL wrote:
int[7] arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7];
writeln(arr[$..$]);
this simply prints a newline... I expected a runtime error (or better
a compile time error) but it does nothing ... why?
Proba
Yes, my fault. As Andrei write on his book
The situation m == n is acceptable and yields an empty slice
Thx.
On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:46:02 RenatoL wrote:
> int[7] arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7];
> writeln(arr[$..$]);
>
> this simply prints a newline... I expected a runtime error (or better
> a compile time error) but it does nothing ... why?
Probably because it's length is zero and therefore isn't actual
int[7] arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7];
writeln(arr[$..$]);
this simply prints a newline... I expected a runtime error (or better
a compile time error) but it does nothing ... why?
13 matches
Mail list logo