I want to write an interface that expresses the following idea: "classes
implementing this interface must have a void function named update, with a
fixed but indeterminate number of parameters of the same (template parameter)
type." In other words, some implementing classes will have void updat
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Doctor J wrote:
> I want to write an interface that expresses the following idea: "classes
> implementing this interface must have a void function named update, with a
> fixed but indeterminate number of parameters of the same (template parameter)
> type." In oth
Doctor J wrote:
> I want to write an interface that expresses the following idea: "classes
> implementing this interface must have a void function named update, with a
> fixed but indeterminate number of parameters of the same (template parameter)
> type."
Use a typesafe variadic function, i.e
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:44 AM, downs wrote:
> Doctor J wrote:
>> I want to write an interface that expresses the following idea: "classes
>> implementing this interface must have a void function named update, with a
>> fixed but indeterminate number of parameters of the same (template
>> parame
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:44 AM, downs wrote:
>> Doctor J wrote:
>>> I want to write an interface that expresses the following idea: "classes
>>> implementing this interface must have a void function named update, with a
>>> fixed but indeterminate number of parameters
downs wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:44 AM, downs wrote:
>>> Doctor J wrote:
I want to write an interface that expresses the following idea: "classes
implementing this interface must have a void function named update, with a
fixed but indeterminate
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:29 AM, downs wrote:
>
> But then isn't what he asks for kinda impossible by design? I mean,
> interfaces are bound at runtime. That's what they _do_.
>
Now read *my* post, downs. ;)
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:29 AM, downs wrote:
>> But then isn't what he asks for kinda impossible by design? I mean,
>> interfaces are bound at runtime. That's what they _do_.
>>
>
> Now read *my* post, downs. ;)
:blushes: