On 2012-01-11 02:21, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 10/01/2012 19:56, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
A template parameter with a template constraint will accept any
callable type. Function
pointer, delegate, struct/class overloading the call operator and so on.
Moreover, if you want to save the callback for
On 2012-01-11 02:05, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 10/01/2012 19:56, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
A template parameter with a template constraint will accept any
callable type. Function
pointer, delegate, struct/class overloading the call operator and so on.
Indeed, this is done in the C++ STL quite a lo
On 10/01/2012 19:56, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
A template parameter with a template constraint will accept any callable type.
Function
pointer, delegate, struct/class overloading the call operator and so on.
Moreover, if you want to save the callback for later use, you need to
distinguish the ca
On 10/01/2012 19:56, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
A template parameter with a template constraint will accept any callable type.
Function
pointer, delegate, struct/class overloading the call operator and so on.
Indeed, this is done in the C++ STL quite a lot.
The drawback is that templated methods
On 2012-01-10 20:24, bls wrote:
On 01/10/2012 06:53 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-01-10 14:48, simendsjo wrote:
On 10.01.2012 14:43, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/10/2012 10:05 PM, simendsjo wrote:
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to
specify
if it should take a func
On 01/10/2012 06:53 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-01-10 14:48, simendsjo wrote:
On 10.01.2012 14:43, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/10/2012 10:05 PM, simendsjo wrote:
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to
specify
if it should take a function or delegate even if I don't
On 10.01.2012 15:53, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-01-10 14:48, simendsjo wrote:
On 10.01.2012 14:43, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/10/2012 10:05 PM, simendsjo wrote:
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to
specify
if it should take a function or delegate even if I don't rea
On 10.01.2012 14:43, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/10/2012 10:05 PM, simendsjo wrote:
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to specify
if it should take a function or delegate even if I don't really care.
What's the best way to accept either? I cannot see any wrapper for
someth
On 2012-01-10 14:48, simendsjo wrote:
On 10.01.2012 14:43, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/10/2012 10:05 PM, simendsjo wrote:
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to specify
if it should take a function or delegate even if I don't really care.
What's the best way to accept eith
On 10.01.2012 14:43, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/10/2012 10:05 PM, simendsjo wrote:
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to specify
if it should take a function or delegate even if I don't really care.
What's the best way to accept either? I cannot see any wrapper for
someth
On 1/10/2012 10:43 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/10/2012 10:05 PM, simendsjo wrote:
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to specify
if it should take a function or delegate even if I don't really care.
What's the best way to accept either? I cannot see any wrapper for
some
On 1/10/2012 10:05 PM, simendsjo wrote:
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to specify
if it should take a function or delegate even if I don't really care.
What's the best way to accept either? I cannot see any wrapper for
something like this in std.typecons.
The simp
If I want to have a method taking a callback function, I have to specify
if it should take a function or delegate even if I don't really care.
What's the best way to accept either? I cannot see any wrapper for
something like this in std.typecons.
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void f(int i, v
13 matches
Mail list logo
