On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:35:17 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Hi,
Suppose that I have an AA that I'm doing lookups on from one thread, and
writing to in another. Is this safe at all?
No.
AA's are not a default-shared type.
If you need a counter-case, just consider that your adding thr
On 16-05-2012 05:21, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:06:54AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 16-05-2012 05:03, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:35:17AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Hi,
Suppose that I have an AA that I'm doing lookups on from one thread,
and
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:06:54AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 16-05-2012 05:03, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:35:17AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Suppose that I have an AA that I'm doing lookups on from one thread,
> >>and writing to in another.
On 16-05-2012 05:03, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:35:17AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Hi,
Suppose that I have an AA that I'm doing lookups on from one thread,
and writing to in another. Is this safe at all? Naturally, I'm
willing to accept the data races involved, but the
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:35:17AM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose that I have an AA that I'm doing lookups on from one thread,
> and writing to in another. Is this safe at all? Naturally, I'm
> willing to accept the data races involved, but the question is
> whether the concur
Hi,
Suppose that I have an AA that I'm doing lookups on from one thread, and
writing to in another. Is this safe at all? Naturally, I'm willing to
accept the data races involved, but the question is whether the
concurrent lookup + mutation is guaranteed to be safe.
--
- Alex
