On Monday, 9 September 2019 at 13:22:22 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
This is incorrect. It was rejected because the proposal was not
solid enough.
I put that a bit bluntly, but as far as I see it, the DIP focused
too much on only adding a way to mark functions as 'no return'
that people were
On Monday, 9 September 2019 at 10:46:10 UTC, Dennis wrote:
Such a shame it got rejected in favor of ugly 'no return'
annotations [...]
This is incorrect. It was rejected because the proposal was not
solid enough. While it is true that a lot of people seemed to
prefer an annotation based
On Monday, 9 September 2019 at 09:37:25 UTC, a11e99z wrote:
cuz throwing exception ever is not compatible with any return
type so I dont see reasons do not allow such expressions
A throw statement can actually be seen as an expression returning
a 'never' / 'bottom' type which is implicitly
On Monday, 9 September 2019 at 09:37:25 UTC, a11e99z wrote:
On Monday, 9 September 2019 at 09:14:08 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
I noticed, that I cannot throw from the lambda expression:
Error: expression expected, not throw
but have to use the longer syntax () {throw new Exception();}
---
void
On Monday, 9 September 2019 at 09:14:08 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
I noticed, that I cannot throw from the lambda expression:
Error: expression expected, not throw
but have to use the longer syntax () {throw new Exception();}
---
void foo(void function() e){}
void main()
{
foo(
() =>
On Monday, 9 September 2019 at 09:14:08 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Hi,
I noticed, that I cannot throw from the lambda expression:
Error: expression expected, not throw
but have to use the longer syntax () {throw new Exception();}
---
void foo(void function() e){}
void main()
{
foo(
Hi,
I noticed, that I cannot throw from the lambda expression:
Error: expression expected, not throw
but have to use the longer syntax () {throw new Exception();}
---
void foo(void function() e){}
void main()
{
foo(
() => throw new Exception()
);
}
---
The shorter lambda
