On Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 22:03:38 UTC, aliak wrote:
It feels like the only difference between a no-arg function
that is @property and one that is not is that the former could
be invoked with optional parentheses and the latter should be
illegal with parentheses.
Edit: err... other way arou
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 14:33:20 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
A free function with a single argument works just fine as a
setter property. e.g. you could do something like
void env(Tuple!(string, string)[] str)
{
// set environment variables
}
env = [tuple("foo", "bar")];
is perfectly
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 13:59:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The derailed plan was to leave alone the ability to call no-arg
functions without parentheses, but to REQUIRE @property to call
an argument-taking function with the assignment style.
See the DIP here: https://wiki.dlang.org/D
On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 13:48:16 aliak via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 18:53:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > writeln = "foo";
> >
> > is legal, and it's dumb, but it hasn't mattered much in
> > practice. So, causing a bunch of code breakage in order to
> > disallow i
On 5/22/18 9:48 AM, aliak wrote:
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 18:53:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
writeln = "foo";
is legal, and it's dumb, but it hasn't mattered much in practice. So,
causing a bunch of code breakage in order to disallow it is unlikely
to go over well. It would also then mak
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 18:53:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
writeln = "foo";
is legal, and it's dumb, but it hasn't mattered much in
practice. So, causing a bunch of code breakage in order to
disallow it is unlikely to go over well. It would also then
make getters and setters inconsisten
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 14:19:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/21/18 8:15 AM, SrMordred wrote:
Right, so this should´n be working I think.
struct SomeStruct
{
void foo(int);
}
SomeStruct s;
s.foo = 10;
I thought that only with @property this will work.
That was the plan, bu
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 18:53:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2018 14:00:55 ANtlord via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
If someone wrote an good DIP on the subject, I expect that
things could be accelerated, but it's not much a real paint
point in practice, and the chances of
On Monday, May 21, 2018 14:00:55 ANtlord via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 11:38:12 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
> > After all this time I saw this:
> >
> > writeln = iota = 5;
> >
> > what??
> >
> > I never saw that before!
> >
> > This is interesting, there is something useful t
"%s %s".writefln = ("foo".tuple = "bar").expand;
lol
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 11:38:12 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
what??
Here's another weird example:
```
void funWithUfcsAndPropertySyntax() {
import std.typecons : tuple;
"%s %s".writefln = ("foo".tuple = "bar").expand;
}
```
source:
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/Idiotmatic-D/blob/
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 11:38:12 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
After all this time I saw this:
writeln = iota = 5;
what??
I never saw that before!
This is interesting, there is something useful that i can do
with this kind of call?
That's pretty cool, but at the same time this should be wiped of
On 5/21/18 8:15 AM, SrMordred wrote:
Right, so this should´n be working I think.
struct SomeStruct
{
void foo(int);
}
SomeStruct s;
s.foo = 10;
I thought that only with @property this will work.
That was the plan, but it got derailed.
Whoever wrote that original line of code, they ne
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 11:38:12 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
After all this time I saw this:
writeln = iota = 5;
what??
I never saw that before!
This is interesting, there is something useful that i can do
with this kind of call?
What the hell is this? I don't figure out why are there so many
Right, so this should´n be working I think.
struct SomeStruct
{
void foo(int);
}
SomeStruct s;
s.foo = 10;
I thought that only with @property this will work.
On Monday, 21 May 2018 at 11:38:12 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
After all this time I saw this:
writeln = iota = 5;
what??
I never saw that before!
This is interesting, there is something useful that i can do
with this kind of call?
I probably wouldn't use that. That wasn't what it was intended
After all this time I saw this:
writeln = iota = 5;
what??
I never saw that before!
This is interesting, there is something useful that i can do with
this kind of call?
17 matches
Mail list logo
