Am Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:09:11 +0100
schrieb "monarch_dodra" :
> On Friday, 1 March 2013 at 13:59:08 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > When trying to implement non-POD types for gdc some time ago I
> > asked on
> > the dmd mailing list what the backend is actually supposed to
> > do for
> > non-POD ty
On Friday, 1 March 2013 at 13:59:08 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
When trying to implement non-POD types for gdc some time ago I
asked on
the dmd mailing list what the backend is actually supposed to
do for
non-POD types. Walter answered that they should never be passed
in
registers:
When trying to implement non-POD types for gdc some time ago I asked on
the dmd mailing list what the backend is actually supposed to do for
non-POD types. Walter answered that they should never be passed in
registers:
--
> Wouldn't it be legal to still pass non-PODs in reg