Thanks:)
**writeln( (v1<<8) + v2 );** is ok
On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 12:51:07 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 12:42:04 UTC, step8 wrote:
I run following test code:
int v1 = 22;
int v2 = 23;
writeln( v1<<8 + v2 );
writeln(
On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 12:42:04 UTC, step8 wrote:
I run following test code:
int v1 = 22;
int v2 = 23;
writeln( v1<<8 + v2 );
writeln( v1<<8 | v2 );
result is 0 and 5655
Why ( v1<<8 + v2 ) = 0 ?
`+` has a higher precedence than `<<`, so the first
I run following test code:
int v1 = 22;
int v2 = 23;
writeln( v1<<8 + v2 );
writeln( v1<<8 | v2 );
result is 0 and 5655
Why ( v1<<8 + v2 ) = 0 ?
