On Wednesday, 17 March 2021 at 19:38:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 March 2021 at 19:32:02 UTC, uranuz wrote:
Seems that a problem with concatenation is because
Throwable.message has const(char)[] type, but not string. This
makes some inconvenience ;-)
Yes, that's what I though
On Wednesday, 17 March 2021 at 19:32:02 UTC, uranuz wrote:
Seems that a problem with concatenation is because
Throwable.message has const(char)[] type, but not string. This
makes some inconvenience ;-)
Yes, that's what I thought.
The concat operation tends to give the most flexible type of th
On Wednesday, 17 March 2021 at 17:52:20 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 March 2021 at 17:46:27 UTC, uranuz wrote:
Also because it is not a property in some contexts when I try
to concatenate it with string without parentheses using "~"
operator it fails
Can you post some sample cod
On Wednesday, 17 March 2021 at 17:46:27 UTC, uranuz wrote:
Also because it is not a property in some contexts when I try
to concatenate it with string without parentheses using "~"
operator it fails
Can you post some sample code that demonstrates this?
The question is why Throwable.message is not a @property?! It
looks strange now, because "message" is not a *verb*, but a
*noun*. So it's expected to be a property. Also because it is not
a property in some contexts when I try to concatenate it with
string without pa
