On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 01:01:09 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:25:15 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's
On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 11:26:12 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 01:01:09 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:25:15 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D.
Ruppe wrote:
[...]
Is there any way
On 09/24/15 13:26, Marc Schütz via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 01:01:09 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:25:15 UTC, tcak wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 23
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's constructor to be called at all unless
"super" is used there.
"If no call to constructors via this or super appear in a
constructor, and
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's constructor to be called at all unless
"super" is used there.
"If no call to constructors via this or super appear in a
constructor, and the base class has a constructor, a call to
super() is inserted at the
On 09/23/2015 02:25 PM, tcak wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's constructor to be called at all unless "super"
is used there.
"If no call to constructors via this or
[code]
import std.stdio;
class B {
this() {
writeln("B.constructor");
foo();
}
void foo() {
writeln("B.foo");
}
}
class D : B {
this() {
writeln("D.constructor");
}
override
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:25:04PM -0700, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 09/23/2015 02:25 PM, tcak wrote:
> >On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> >>On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
> >>>I wouldn't expect B's
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:25:15 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's constructor to be called at all unless
"super" is used there.
"If no call to
