Re: Why non-@property functions don't need parentheses

2011-02-07 Thread %u
> It will be fixed at some point, but it hasn't been yet. Oh cool, all right; thanks!

Re: Why non-@property functions don't need parentheses

2011-02-06 Thread Simen kjaeraas
%u wrote: Hi, I was wondering, why are we allowed to omit parentheses when calling functions with no arguments, when they are not @properties? Is there a good reason for relaxing the language rules like this? This behavior is deprecated, but other features have had a higher priority tha

Re: Why non-@property functions don't need parentheses

2011-02-06 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Sunday 06 February 2011 20:38:29 %u wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering, why are we allowed to omit parentheses when calling > functions with no arguments, when they are not @properties? Is there a > good reason for relaxing the language rules like this? Because the compiler is not in line with T

Why non-@property functions don't need parentheses

2011-02-06 Thread %u
Hi, I was wondering, why are we allowed to omit parentheses when calling functions with no arguments, when they are not @properties? Is there a good reason for relaxing the language rules like this? Thanks!