On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 05:49:15 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 03:44:58 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
Is there anything I can do to improve zip, before I go ahead
and change to the faster but slightly less readable enumerate?
The problem might be that zip checks both arrays
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 03:44:58 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
Is there anything I can do to improve zip, before I go ahead
and change to the faster but slightly less readable enumerate?
The problem might be that zip checks both arrays for empty during
each step, enumerate only the first
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 04:40:42 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 03:44:58 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
[...]
This sounds like a very limited case: if you're not zipping
against a iota(foo) then there's no comparing with enumerate,
they simply don't do the same thing at
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 03:44:58 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
Hello,
Idiomatically, I make use of zip, however, when looking to
speed up my program, notice that using enumerate leads to a
20-30% improvement:
void main(){
auto x = iota(1_000).array;
auto y = iota(1_000).array;
Hello,
Idiomatically, I make use of zip, however, when looking to speed
up my program, notice that using enumerate leads to a 20-30%
improvement:
void main(){
auto x = iota(1_000).array;
auto y = iota(1_000).array;
auto func1() {
return zip(x,y).map!(a => a[0]+a[1])
