On Monday, 6 May 2019 at 14:48:56 UTC, faissaloo wrote:
misunderstood how allocation works when instantiating a struct
that uses alias this:
alias this has no effect on allocation at all. All it does is if
x.y
doesn't compile, it rewrites it to
x.alias_this.y
(or if f(x) doesn't work, it
On Monday, 6 May 2019 at 14:48:56 UTC, faissaloo wrote:
I've been having some memory issues (referenced objects turning
to nulls for no apparent reason) and I was wondering if I've
misunderstood how allocation works when instantiating a struct
that uses alias this:
import std.stdio;
On Monday, 6 May 2019 at 15:17:37 UTC, aliak wrote:
Do you have an example of a referenced object turning to null?
We may be able to spot something
Unfortunately I haven't managed to produce an example any smaller
than my entire codebase
On Monday, 6 May 2019 at 14:48:56 UTC, faissaloo wrote:
I've been having some memory issues (referenced objects turning
to nulls for no apparent reason) and I was wondering if I've
misunderstood how allocation works when instantiating a struct
that uses alias this:
import std.stdio;
I've been having some memory issues (referenced objects turning
to nulls for no apparent reason) and I was wondering if I've
misunderstood how allocation works when instantiating a struct
that uses alias this:
import std.stdio;
struct Parent {
int a;
