On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 04:55:23 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/17/2012 02:00 PM, simendsjo wrote:
Sounds like a bug. C style initializers work in other cases:
I try not to use them. I think they have this 'feature' of
leaving unspecified members uninitialized:
struct S
{
int i;
Le 18/04/2012 12:41, maarten van damme a écrit :
That's a very odd design. Making it work when instantiating a new struct
of that type but not inline. Anyway, test(3,5) works perfect, thank you.
It's not odd at all. You append a structure, not an array.
{3,5} is for array initialization, it's
On 04/18/2012 12:16 AM, Kenji Hara wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 04:55:23 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
assert(s.d == double.nan); // -- fails (may work for you)
You should use std.math.isNaN whether a floating point value is NaN.
assert(isNaN(s.d)); // -- success
That a thousandth
Ali:
That a thousandth time I have made that mistake and still have not
learned. :( Yes, .nan may not be compared with any other value,
including .nan.
Today I'll present an enhancement request to remove this problem from D.
Hugs,
bearophile
On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 16:36:39 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Ali:
That a thousandth time I have made that mistake and still have
not learned. :( Yes, .nan may not be compared with any other
value, including .nan.
Today I'll present an enhancement request to remove this
problem from D.
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 19:04:12 SomeDude wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 16:36:39 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Ali:
That a thousandth time I have made that mistake and still have
not learned. :( Yes, .nan may not be compared with any other
value, including .nan.
Today I'll
On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 18:18:44 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/18/2012 10:13 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It's by design. An enhancement request is a waste of time.
Comparisons with
NaN _always_ return false regardless of what they're compared
against - even
NaN. It's not going to
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:50:10PM +0200, SomeDude wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 18:18:44 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/18/2012 10:13 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It's by design. An enhancement request is a waste of time.
Comparisons with NaN _always_ return false regardless of what
SomeDude:
It shouldn't be a problem to detect comparisons against
literal .nan values. The compiler can warn with comparison is
always false.
Ali
Now THAT makes sense.
That's what my proposal is going to be, with small refinements
:-) (And it think it's not the first time someone
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:18:44 Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/18/2012 10:13 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 19:04:12 SomeDude wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 April 2012 at 16:36:39 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Ali:
That a thousandth time I have made that mistake and still have
Just for fun I decided to complete some codejam challenges in D. At some
point I wanted to add structs to an array but I got a compiler error. What
am I doing wrong?
code:
struct test{
int x;
int y;
}
void main(){
test[] why;
why~={3,5};
}
error:
wait.d(7): found '}' when expecting ';' following
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:28:31PM +0200, maarten van damme wrote:
Just for fun I decided to complete some codejam challenges in D. At
some point I wanted to add structs to an array but I got a compiler
error. What am I doing wrong?
code:
struct test{
int x;
int y;
}
void main(){
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:28:31 +0200, maarten van damme
maartenvd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for fun I decided to complete some codejam challenges in D. At some
point I wanted to add structs to an array but I got a compiler error.
What
am I doing wrong?
code:
struct test{
int x;
int y;
}
simendsjo:
Sounds like a bug. C style initializers work in other cases:
D language is so much irregular, so many special cases that don't
work :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, 17 April 2012 at 21:00:55 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:28:31 +0200, maarten van damme
maartenvd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for fun I decided to complete some codejam challenges in
D. At some
point I wanted to add structs to an array but I got a compiler
error. What
On 04/17/2012 02:00 PM, simendsjo wrote:
Sounds like a bug. C style initializers work in other cases:
I try not to use them. I think they have this 'feature' of leaving
unspecified members uninitialized:
struct S
{
int i;
double d;
}
void main()
{
S s = { 42 }; //
16 matches
Mail list logo
