On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 15:51:31 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 13:05:26 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Are you able to support a syntax like:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields!(
bool, "b", 1,
uint, "i=2", 3,
short, "s=5", 4));
}
That does look cleaner and better
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 13:05:26 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Era Scarecrow:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields_D!(
bitfields!( //borrowed from std.bitmanip
bool, "b", 1,
uint, "i", 3,
short, "s", 4),
"i=2",
"s=5"));
}
Are you able to support a syntax like:
struct defs {
On 12.06.2012 17:05, bearophile wrote:
Era Scarecrow:
Are you able to support a syntax like:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields!(
bool, "b", 1,
uint, "i=2", 3,
short, "s=5", 4));
}
Or iff bitfields is a mixin template:
struct defs {
mixin bitfields!(
bool, "b", 1,
uint, "i=2",
Era Scarecrow:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields_D!(
bitfields!( //borrowed from std.bitmanip
bool, "b", 1,
uint, "i", 3,
short, "s", 4),
"i=2",
"s=5"));
}
Are you able to support a syntax like:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields!(
bool, "b", 1,
uint, "i=
On Tuesday, 5 June 2012 at 00:17:08 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Era Scarecrow:
The documentation for bitfields doesn't go into detail if you
can put any default values into it. Can you?
I think you can't. See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4425
Bye,
bearophile
K, I think I have
Era Scarecrow:
The documentation for bitfields doesn't go into detail if you
can put any default values into it. Can you?
I think you can't. See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4425
Bye,
bearophile
The documentation for bitfields doesn't go into detail if you
can put any default values into it. Can you? It makes sense if
you can that it would convert the whole thing into a single
number (or or-ing the results into a single expression with
shifting and all).
From what I can tell it all
