Re: bug? dmd -o- does not write executable

2013-04-04 Thread Timothee Cour
Sorry but if this is the intent then dmd's help message should make this clear: -o- do not write object file = -o- do not write object file nor executable Intended. No object files = no way to link the executable. I was thinking in that case the object files were created in a temp

Re: bug? dmd -o- does not write executable

2013-04-04 Thread Ivan Kazmenko
-o- do not write object file By the description, I first thought of -o- as a way to erase the object files after linking the executable. That would have been nice.

Re: bug? dmd -o- does not write executable

2013-04-03 Thread Andrej Mitrovic
On 4/3/13, Timothee Cour thelastmamm...@gmail.com wrote: dmd -o- does not write executable is this a bug or intended? Intended. No object files = no way to link the executable.

bug? dmd -o- does not write executable

2013-04-02 Thread Timothee Cour
dmd -o- does not write executable is this a bug or intended? the doc is at best confusing: -o-do not write object file if it's intended, should be: do not write object file nor executable Thanks, Timothee

Re: bug? dmd -o- does not write executable

2013-04-02 Thread Timothee Cour
(this is related: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/jp2j66$2rdv$1...@digitalmars.com, but the issue still holds) On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Timothee Cour thelastmamm...@gmail.com wrote: dmd -o- does not write executable is this a bug or intended? the doc is at best confusing: -o-