Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> Long story short - why use D if you aren't going to be able to take
> advantage of the very things that make it cool?
Not only GC makes it cool. D has a number of other features.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ViktorKrescvohn Wrote:
>
>> i used to c-style pointer heavy programming, is it wise to code c-style on d
>> platfrom, i mean by turning off GC and stuff.
>
> I think, turning off GC is possible if you rewrite Phobos or get rid o
ViktorKrescvohn Wrote:
> i used to c-style pointer heavy programming, is it wise to code c-style on d
> platfrom, i mean by turning off GC and stuff.
I think, turning off GC is possible if you rewrite Phobos or get rid of it
completely.
If you're going to write C code in D, what's the point of using D? The
GC is your friend, usually, and unless you really know a lot about its
functions, just let it do its thing. Of course, if you're porting C code
over, that's a different matter, but when writing new D code, try to use
the lan
i used to c-style pointer heavy programming, is it wise to code c-style on d
platfrom, i mean by turning off GC and stuff.
