Dnia 2009-06-01, pon o godzinie 16:44 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer pisze:
> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:01:04 -0400, Witold Baryluk
> wrote:
>
> > Dnia 2009-05-31, nie o godzinie 15:36 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley pisze:
> >> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Witold Baryluk
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Ho
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:01:04 -0400, Witold Baryluk
wrote:
Dnia 2009-05-31, nie o godzinie 15:36 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley pisze:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Witold Baryluk
wrote:
>
> Horrible.
>
> How to ensure constness of data, and still have possibility of
changing references of
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Dnia 2009-05-31, nie o godzinie 15:36 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley pisze:
>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Witold Baryluk
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Horrible.
>> >
>> > How to ensure constness of data, and still have possibility of changing
>> >
Dnia 2009-05-31, nie o godzinie 15:36 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley pisze:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Witold Baryluk
> wrote:
> >
> > Horrible.
> >
> > How to ensure constness of data, and still have possibility of changing
> > references of local variables?
>
> Rebindable.
>
> http://www.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Witold Baryluk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i haven't been here for so long time. So hi all. I'm back again.
>
> I was considering myself as hardcore D hacker, but
> in one point I fail completly. Constness.
>
> Consider this simple code:
>
> module ct;
>
> class C {
>
Hi,
i haven't been here for so long time. So hi all. I'm back again.
I was considering myself as hardcore D hacker, but
in one point I fail completly. Constness.
Consider this simple code:
module ct;
class C {
const int a;
const C b;
this(int a_) {
a =
