Thanks, now it looks obviously messy to me as well :)
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:02:12 +0100, Simen kjaeraas
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:32:20 +0100, strtr wrote:
Personally, I use (D1)std2.conv a lot to get values from strings and
thus would love the following default behaviour for all types:
int i = "0"; // i = 0
i = cast( int ) "0"; // i
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:32:20 -0500, strtr wrote:
Personally, I use (D1)std2.conv a lot to get values from strings and
thus would love the following default behaviour for all types:
int i = "0"; // i = 0
Um... why? How is int i = 0; more difficult to use/understand than int i
= "0";
If
On 01/28/2010 02:32 AM, strtr wrote:
Personally, I use (D1)std2.conv a lot to get values from strings and thus would
love the following default behaviour for all types:
int i = "0"; // i = 0
i = cast( int ) "0"; // i = 48 ( If I read the utf8 table correctly )
What keeps this from being the ca
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:32:20 +0100, strtr wrote:
Personally, I use (D1)std2.conv a lot to get values from strings and
thus would love the following default behaviour for all types:
int i = "0"; // i = 0
i = cast( int ) "0"; // i = 48 ( If I read the utf8 table correctly )
What keeps this fr
Personally, I use (D1)std2.conv a lot to get values from strings and thus would
love the following default behaviour for all types:
int i = "0"; // i = 0
i = cast( int ) "0"; // i = 48 ( If I read the utf8 table correctly )
What keeps this from being the case?