Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported? Or perhaps have its guts incorporated completely into
gcc?
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 00:43:59 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported?
dmd will continue to be supported.
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 00:43:59 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported? Or perhaps have its guts incorporated completely
into gcc?
DMD doesn't really require GCC, G
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 01:31:12 UTC, mawk wrote:
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 00:43:59 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported? Or perhaps have its guts incorporated
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 04:47:26 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
gcc is currently required for dmd on FreeBSD, as dmd links to
libstdc++.
Parts of dmd are still written in C++ but most of it was
converted recently. More on that here:
"DMD backend now in D"
https://forum.dlang.org/threa
On Friday, November 30, 2018 2:43:41 AM MST welkam via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 04:47:26 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
>
> wrote:
> > gcc is currently required for dmd on FreeBSD, as dmd links to
> > libstdc++.
>
> Parts of dmd are still written in C++ but most of it wa
