On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:50:53 +, Rory wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 06:48:26 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> but why do you need this? just use `atomicLoad` to get shared variable
>> value, it will do the right caching.
>
> Nice! Thanks. Tested atomicLoad and it is slightly faster for my non
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 06:48:26 UTC, ketmar wrote:
but why do you need this? just use `atomicLoad` to get shared
variable
value, it will do the right caching.
Nice! Thanks. Tested atomicLoad and it is slightly faster for my
non blocking queue.
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 06:29:33 +, Rory wrote:
> Is there a way I can stop "current" from being optimized out without
> using "volatile"?
but why do you need this? just use `atomicLoad` to get shared variable
value, it will do the right caching.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Is there a way I can stop "current" from being optimized out
without using "volatile"?
The compiler is suggesting I replace "volatile" with
"synchronized" but I don't want it synchronized?
Would a memory barrier work?
shared n = new int(value);
for (;;) {
volatile auto current = payloa
