On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 18:54:08 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I stand corrected. Shouldn't have trusted the documentation so
much, I guess.
It makes perfect sense to intuit that --single should be related
to --build-mode=singleFile. As it is the build modes aren't
explained in the
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 17:49:42 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 17:26:06 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 17:15:25 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
You can also use dub build --build-mode=singleFile, and it
will compile one file at a time. It'll be
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 17:26:06 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 17:15:25 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
You can also use dub build --build-mode=singleFile, and it
will compile one file at a time. It'll be slow but slow is
better than OOM.
singleFile is for
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 17:15:25 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
You can also use dub build --build-mode=singleFile, and it will
compile one file at a time. It'll be slow but slow is better
than OOM.
singleFile is for single-file packages [1]. The option you're
thinking of is
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 17:06:21 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:01:53 UTC, bokuno_D wrote:
i run "dub build" on it. but OOM kill the compiler.
-
is there a way to reduce memory consumtion of the compiler?
or maybe third party tool? alternative to dub?
Assuming
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:01:53 UTC, bokuno_D wrote:
i run "dub build" on it. but OOM kill the compiler.
-
is there a way to reduce memory consumtion of the compiler?
or maybe third party tool? alternative to dub?
Assuming you are using DMD, there is -lowmem switch to enable
garbage
i want to compile individual module that are required to compile
the main module.
i just start learning D yeserday, i tried to compile serve-D LSP
tobe used with SublimeLSP.
i run "dub build" on it. but OOM kill the compiler.
-
is there a way to reduce memory consumtion of the compiler?
or
