On 07/09/2013 02:32 PM, Artur Skawina wrote:
IIRC this issue is already reported somewhere in bugzilla.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7653
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 12:32:55 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 07/09/13 12:50, John Colvin wrote:
JS asked about this in the main group, but here is more
appropriate and I'm quite interested myself.
Function/delegate *literals* in aggregates are not accepted by
the compiler.
Probably call
On 07/09/13 12:50, John Colvin wrote:
> JS asked about this in the main group, but here is more appropriate and I'm
> quite interested myself.
Function/delegate *literals* in aggregates are not accepted by the compiler.
It's just a compiler issue; iirc the frontend recently got a bit smarter abou
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 11:16:39 UTC, bearophile wrote:
So is it worth adding this diagnostic bug report in Bugzilla?
...
I think yes. It should either just work or provide error message
that actually explains the reasoning. Probably Don can clarify
this as static initialization of a fie
Dicebot:
So this has something to do with _initialization_ of class
members with delegates/lambdas, not their very existence.
So is it worth adding this diagnostic bug report in Bugzilla?
class Foo {
void delegate() dg1;
void delegate() dg2 = delegate(){};
this() {
this.
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 10:50:02 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
JS asked about this in the main group, but here is more
appropriate and I'm quite interested myself.
Can someone explain the rationale behind this:
class A
{
auto a = (){}; //Lambda not allowed
auto b = function()
JS asked about this in the main group, but here is more
appropriate and I'm quite interested myself.
Can someone explain the rationale behind this:
class A
{
auto a = (){}; //Lambda not allowed
auto b = function(){}; //Function allowed
auto c = delegate(){}; /
