On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:33:07 UTC, vit wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:17:54 UTC, rempas wrote:
[...]
1) That printed code on standard output is wrong, missing
declaration for is_same and i8.
2) if-else must be in same mixin:
```d
mixin(""
+
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:29:08PM +, Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> That said, rolling your own mixins should really be the last resort.
> You're dumping a lot into a single line of code you can't trace,
> follow, debug, or look at.
Mixins are kinda like the nuclear
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 08:40:15 UTC, rempas wrote:
I'm trying to use mixins and enums to "expand" code in place
but the results are not what I expected and I'm getting an
weird error. I have created the smallest possible example to
reproduce the error and it is the following:
Back
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 17:48:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Yeah, this won't fly. Whatever you pass to mixin must be one or
more
*complete* declaration or (possibly compound) statements. It's
illegal
to pass the `static if` and its else-clause to two different
mixin()
invocations (they are
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:40:15AM +, rempas via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> void test(bool signed)(int num, int base) {
> static if (signed) {
> mixin(type_check!("static if", "i8", "true", "5", "4", "10", "5"));
> mixin(type_check!("else static if", "i16", "true", "7", "6",
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 10:47:44 UTC, rempas wrote:
There may be a problem in the "type_check" enum but I wanted to
post this reply before I search any any case there is something
else happening and you happen to know. I will update if I found
it
Well, it is specifically the "static
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:33:07 UTC, vit wrote:
2) if-else must be in same mixin:
```d
mixin(""
+ type_check!("static if", "i8", "true", "5", "4",
"10", "5")
+ type_check!("else static if", "i16", "true", "7",
"6", "18", "8")
+ type_check!("else static if",
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:17:54 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:02:53 UTC, vit wrote:
Try this:
```d
pragma(msg, type_check!("static if", "i8", "true", "5", "4",
"10", "5"));
```
Result:
```d
static if(is_same!(num, i8)) {
mixin(base_digit!("5", "4", "10",
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:02:53 UTC, vit wrote:
Try this:
```d
pragma(msg, type_check!("static if", "i8", "true", "5", "4",
"10", "5"));
```
Result:
```d
static if(is_same!(num, i8)) {
mixin(base_digit!("5", "4", "10", "5"));
static if (true) {
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 08:40:15 UTC, rempas wrote:
I'm trying to use mixins and enums to "expand" code in place
but the results are not what I expected and I'm getting an
weird error. I have created the smallest possible example to
reproduce the error and it is the following:
[...]
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 08:40:15 UTC, rempas wrote:
I'm trying to use mixins and enums to "expand" code in place
but the results are not what I expected and I'm getting an
weird error. I have created the smallest possible example to
reproduce the error and it is the following:
[...]
I'm trying to use mixins and enums to "expand" code in place but
the results are not what I expected and I'm getting an weird
error. I have created the smallest possible example to reproduce
the error and it is the following:
```
enum base_digit(string ten, string sixteen, string two, string
12 matches
Mail list logo
