On Saturday, May 19, 2012 17:28:46 maarten van damme wrote:
and something partially unrelated, how do you copy a class by value?
You don't. If the class has a clone method (which would fairly typically be
called dup in D), then you can clone it, but classes are reference types, not
value
well, they we're interfaces and it made sense to implement them as a
class. On the other hand, a struct is way more efficient and works
just as good. Thanks for clearing everything up.
so would it be wrong to make movefront simply change the index the
front is pointing at without removing a prime?
And I'm coming from a java world so it would make sense to me to
create that range as a class that implements a range but in most
examples I see everyone using structs instead. what
and something partially unrelated, how do you copy a class by value?
On Friday, May 18, 2012 14:21:23 maarten van damme wrote:
I am trying to write a randomaccessinfinite range that returns primes
using the sieve of aristotle. I am however having problems
understanding the difference between moveAt and opIndex;
according to dlang;
ElementType opIndex(size_t
In your case, I don't think you really need to define a moveAt.
opIndex is what's required for a Random Access Range and it
really doesn't make sense to define moveAt for your particular
problem.
On Friday, 18 May 2012 at 12:21:31 UTC, maarten van damme wrote:
Whats the difference between
On Friday, May 18, 2012 14:50:31 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
moveFront is used to move the front of a range for stuff like swap, when
simply copying elements is too expensive. It's destructive in that the
element isn't there anymore when you do that.
I mean that the value isn't there. The ranges
