On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 11:20:03 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 09/10/2019 03:32 AM, Andre Pany wrote:
> [...]
The UDA syntax allows both types and an objects. method0 uses
Foo type and method1 uses a Foo object. So, if your API allows
both, your code that deals with UDA must
On 09/10/2019 03:32 AM, Andre Pany wrote:
> @Foo void method0(){}
>
> @Foo("abc") void method1(){}
The UDA syntax allows both types and an objects. method0 uses Foo type
and method1 uses a Foo object. So, if your API allows both, your code
that deals with UDA must account for both.
On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 10:32:29 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Hi,
following coding is throwing compiler error:
need this for name of type string
The error disappears if I delete method0.
My gut feeling is, this is a compiler bug?
---
class C
{
static this()
{
getT!(typeof
Hi,
following coding is throwing compiler error:
need this for name of type string
The error disappears if I delete method0.
My gut feeling is, this is a compiler bug?
---
class C
{
static this()
{
getT!(typeof(this))();
}
@Foo void method0(){}
@Foo("abc&q
