On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 02:42:30 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
immutable(ElementEncodingType!(ElementType!Range))[]
buildPath(Range)(Range segments) if (isInputRange!Range
isSomeString!(ElementType!Range));
pure nothrow @safe immutable(C)[] buildPath(C)(const(C)[][]
paths...) if
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 10:42:24 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 07:36:55 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 02:42:30 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
immutable(ElementEncodingType!(ElementType!Range))[]
buildPath(Range)(Range segments) if (isInputRange!Range
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 07:36:55 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 02:42:30 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
immutable(ElementEncodingType!(ElementType!Range))[]
buildPath(Range)(Range segments) if (isInputRange!Range
isSomeString!(ElementType!Range));
pure nothrow @safe
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 02:42:30 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
immutable(ElementEncodingType!(ElementType!Range))[]
buildPath(Range)(Range segments) if (isInputRange!Range
isSomeString!(ElementType!Range));
pure nothrow @safe immutable(C)[] buildPath(C)(const(C)[][]
paths...) if
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 09:55:02 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
And the constraints you need not read - unless you want to
understand why your call to the function failed. C++ is just
lacking without them. Having them avoids that you always have
to handle ridiculous input within
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 07:36:55 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 02:42:30 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
immutable(ElementEncodingType!(ElementType!Range))[]
buildPath(Range)(Range segments) if (isInputRange!Range
isSomeString!(ElementType!Range));
pure nothrow @safe
On Sunday 30 August 2015 04:42, Spacen Jasset wrote:
immutable(ElementEncodingType!(ElementType!Range))[]
buildPath(Range)(Range segments) if (isInputRange!Range
isSomeString!(ElementType!Range));
pure nothrow @safe immutable(C)[] buildPath(C)(const(C)[][]
paths...) if (isSomeChar!C);
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 07:36:53AM +, BBasile via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 02:42:30 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
immutable(ElementEncodingType!(ElementType!Range))[]
buildPath(Range)(Range segments) if (isInputRange!Range
isSomeString!(ElementType!Range));
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 02:42:30 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
The following reminds me of the good old C++ template errors
the C++ compiler spits out.
Whilst D has fixed that problem, some things have gotten more
complex. I just wanted to find a replacement for D1 path join,
and found
Hi!
I completely agree. D1 is much better :-) I removed a threading
support from my variant because program don't start if OS don't have
a POSIX threading (LInux 2.4.37 for example). A garbage colllector can
be disabled (as I understand). May be a compiler support (warnings) is
needed if gc will
The following reminds me of the good old C++ template errors the
C++ compiler spits out.
Whilst D has fixed that problem, some things have gotten more
complex. I just wanted to find a replacement for D1 path join,
and found this, but it doesn't seem very easy to wade though this
stuff.
11 matches
Mail list logo
