Namespace:
So only GDC optimized "pure" functions at all?
I've seen DMD performs some optimizations with "strongly pure"
functions that return integral values.
If you have code like:
int sqr(in int x) pure nothrow { return x * x; }
int y = ...
auto r = sqr(y) + sqr(y);
I think DMD replac
On Friday, 20 April 2012 at 09:55:28 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/20/2012 10:06 AM, Namespace wrote:
The sense of pure functions isn't clear to me.
What is the advantage of pure functions / methods?
1. It enables stateless reasoning about program parts.
2. It enables certain com
On 04/20/2012 10:06 AM, Namespace wrote:
The sense of pure functions isn't clear to me.
What is the advantage of pure functions / methods?
1. It enables stateless reasoning about program parts.
2. It enables certain compiler optimizations.
I inform the compiler with "const" t
On 4/20/2012 3:06 AM, Namespace wrote:
The sense of pure functions isn't clear to me.
What is the advantage of pure functions / methods?
I inform the compiler with "const" that this method does not change the
current object, and therefore he can optimize (at least in C++) this
On 4/20/12 4:06 PM, Namespace wrote:
The sense of pure functions isn't clear to me.
What is the advantage of pure functions / methods?
I inform the compiler with "const" that this method does not change the
current object, and therefore he can optimize (at least in C++) this
metho
The sense of pure functions isn't clear to me.
What is the advantage of pure functions / methods?
I inform the compiler with "const" that this method does not
change the current object, and therefore he can optimize (at
least in C++) this method. How and what optimized the comp
