On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 15:35:00 UTC, Patrick D. Jeeves
wrote:
One thing I've been trying to figure out is how to do the
following in D:
class foo
{
string bar();
};
void foo::bar()
{
return "hello world!";
}
From what I can gather constructs like this just aren't allowed
in D
On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 15:35:00 UTC, Patrick D. Jeeves
wrote:
From what I can gather constructs like this just aren't allowed
in D, but I don't understand why, can anyone explain it please?
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP47
There is a threadnaught related to the above DIP somewhere. I
perso
Adam D. Ruppe:
It just wasn't there but there's some people who think it would
be a good idea to add (including Walter I think) so it might be
in later.
It increases the syntactic variance of D code, and people coming
from C++ will go using it straight (and not just in the uncommon
cases di
On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 15:41:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 15:35:00 UTC, Patrick D. Jeeves
wrote:
[...]
Is this because it isn't possible to do such things, or
because it would be rather pointless to do so compared to
simpler approaches, (in this case call
On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 15:35:00 UTC, Patrick D. Jeeves
wrote:
One thing I've been trying to figure out is how to do the
following in D:
class foo
{
string bar();
};
void foo::bar()
{
return "hello world!";
}
From what I can gather constructs like this just aren't allowed
in D
On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 15:35:00 UTC, Patrick D. Jeeves
wrote:
From what I can gather constructs like this just aren't allowed
in D, but I don't understand why, can anyone explain it please?
It just wasn't there but there's some people who think it would
be a good idea to add (including
One thing I've been trying to figure out is how to do the
following in D:
class foo
{
string bar();
};
void foo::bar()
{
return "hello world!";
}
From what I can gather constructs like this just aren't allowed
in D, but I don't understand why, can anyone explain it please?
I know th
