On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 00:28:03 Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 06:23 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > No. It's not. It's a temporary, and temporaries are almost always rvalues.
> > The sole (and very bizarre) exception is struct literals (e.g. ABC(20) is
> > currently considered an lvalue).
>
On 04/02/2012 06:23 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
No. It's not. It's a temporary, and temporaries are almost always rvalues. The
sole (and very bizarre) exception is struct literals (e.g. ABC(20) is
currently considered an lvalue).
DMD 2.059head treats struct literals as rvalues.
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:23:50 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
No. It's not. It's a temporary, and temporaries are almost always
rvalues. The
sole (and very bizarre) exception is struct literals (e.g. ABC(20) is
currently considered an lvalue). It results in the bizarre situation
that a
fun
On Monday, 2 April 2012 at 05:03:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, April 01, 2012 21:23:50 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 05:46:24 L-MAN wrote:
Sure, if you have large structs, making a lot of copies of
them can be
expensive. But to avoid that, you're going to have t
On Sunday, April 01, 2012 21:23:50 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Monday, April 02, 2012 05:46:24 L-MAN wrote:
> Sure, if you have large structs, making a lot of copies of them can be
> expensive. But to avoid that, you're going to have to avoid coding in a way
> which creates temporaries, and expres
On Monday, April 02, 2012 05:46:24 L-MAN wrote:
> About temporaries in operators +-/*.. you're right, it is not a
> secret.
> references in other functions (not in operators) too.
>
>
> I can't understand one thing:
> ABC abc; // ABC is a struct that consists of some 4x4 matrix for
> example
>
On Sunday, 1 April 2012 at 08:22:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, April 01, 2012 09:10:58 L-MAN wrote:
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 21:42:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> On Saturday, March 31, 2012 23:25:51 L-MAN wrote:
>> Hello everybody!
>>
>> I'm trying to use some function FN
On Sunday, April 01, 2012 09:10:58 L-MAN wrote:
> On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 21:42:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 31, 2012 23:25:51 L-MAN wrote:
> >> Hello everybody!
> >>
> >> I'm trying to use some function FN like this:
> >>
> >> struct X
> >> {
> >>
> >> pro
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 21:42:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 23:25:51 L-MAN wrote:
Hello everybody!
I'm trying to use some function FN like this:
struct X
{
protected double _x; // double type for example
public @property double X() const { return _x; }
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 21:42:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 23:25:51 L-MAN wrote:
Hello everybody!
I'm trying to use some function FN like this:
struct X
{
protected double _x; // double type for example
public @property double X() const { return _x; }
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 23:25:51 L-MAN wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm trying to use some function FN like this:
>
> struct X
> {
> protected double _x; // double type for example
> public @property double X() const { return _x; }
>
> // ctor
> public this(double x) { _x = x; } //
Hello everybody!
I'm trying to use some function FN like this:
struct X
{
protected double _x; // double type for example
public @property double X() const { return _x; }
// ctor
public this(double x) { _x = x; } // double type for example
void FN(ref const(double) in_x) // double type f
12 matches
Mail list logo
