On 2012-05-29 21:18, Sharp wrote:
Hi all!
I've spend several hours to solve my problem, and I did it!
But don't know why it is worked in this way:
I'd like to modify all fields of an object by a specific values (for
deserialization).
If you want a serialization library:
https://github.com/ja
Thanks a lot Ali, I understand now!
Philippe, based on what Ali said, your code will give exactly the
same result because it looping through a local copy of
ret.tupleof.
On 05/29/2012 12:18 PM, Sharp wrote:
> public ref T foo(T)() {
> T *ret = new T;
> // DON'T WORK
> // Looping through fields in this way doesn't modify the object
> auto fields = ret.tupleof;
Looks like fields is a local copy of ret.tupleof so the following
modifies just that copy.
> foreach(
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Sharp wrote:
What does it give if you do:
> foreach(index, unused; fields) {
> fields[index] = 1;
>}
?
Hi all!
I've spend several hours to solve my problem, and I did it!
But don't know why it is worked in this way:
I'd like to modify all fields of an object by a specific values
(for deserialization).
public ref T foo(T)() {
T *ret = new T;
// DON'T WORK
// Looping thro