On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 12:35:39 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 12:30:22 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
If you want this to work, you need your lambdas to take the
casted value as a parameter:
Thanks.
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 12:30:22 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
If you want this to work, you need your lambdas to take the
casted value as a parameter:
void test(T)(T value) {
int i;
string s;
match!(value,
int, (val) => i = val,
string, (val) => s = val
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 10:39:09 UTC, John wrote:
Thanks for the help, both. This appeared to work, until I
realised the lambda isn't static:
void match(T, cases...)() {
static if (cases.length == 1) cases[0]();
else static if (cases.length > 2) {
static if
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 09:12:12 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 09:07:19 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
Instead of passing functions to match!, pass pairs of
arguments, like this:
match!(T,
int, writeln("Matched int"),
is(T : SomeObject),
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 09:07:19 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
Instead of passing functions to match!, pass pairs of
arguments, like this:
match!(T,
int, writeln("Matched int"),
is(T : SomeObject), writeln("Derives from SomeObject");
);
Now, in the
also, there is a subtle bug in matcher. sorry. ;-)
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 08:46:05 UTC, John wrote:
Anyone able to improve on it?
q hack:
template tyma(T, Cases...) {
import std.traits;
template GetFunc(size_t idx) {
static if (idx >= Cases.length) {
static assert(0, "no delegate for match");
} else static if
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 08:46:05 UTC, John wrote:
Writing a long series of "static if ... else" statements can be
tedious and I'm prone to leaving out the crucial "static" after
"else", so I was wondered if it was possible to write a
template that would resemble the switch statement, but
Writing a long series of "static if ... else" statements can be
tedious and I'm prone to leaving out the crucial "static" after
"else", so I was wondered if it was possible to write a template
that would resemble the switch statement, but for types.
Closest I came up to was this:
void
