On Thursday, 29 March 2012 at 04:25:54 UTC, James Miller wrote:
I find the distaste of reviving a thread strange. It would be
like removing
the reopened feature of bug tracking software (who wants to
transpose all
that information).
I have no problem with it, if I did, I would have said so.
On Tuesday, 10 April 2007 at 07:46:35 UTC, Bill Baxter wrote:
Derek Parnell wrote:
Currently, the functions in std.conv throw an exception if the
input string
is empty. What is the rationale for this?
I too thought this behavior was silly, so I wrote a little
wrapper for it (replying 5
On 29 March 2012 16:03, cc c...@nevernet.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 April 2007 at 07:46:35 UTC, Bill Baxter wrote:
I too thought this behavior was silly, so I wrote a little wrapper for it
(replying 5 years after the fact because someone'll probably stumble onto
this question through Google
On Thursday, 29 March 2012 at 03:40:55 UTC, James Miller wrote:
I award thee the Necromancer badge, for reviving a long-dead
thread.
--
James Miller
I find the distaste of reviving a thread strange. It would be
like removing the reopened feature of bug tracking software
(who wants to
On 29 March 2012 17:05, Jesse Phillips jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 29 March 2012 at 03:40:55 UTC, James Miller wrote:
I award thee the Necromancer badge, for reviving a long-dead thread.
--
James Miller
I find the distaste of reviving a thread strange. It would be like
