On Monday, 19 February 2024 at 04:47:07 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
On 19/02/2024 5:33 PM, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
On Monday, 19 February 2024 at 01:42:03 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
Indeed, nothing in that function body would suggest it needs to
be a forwar
On Monday, 19 February 2024 at 01:42:03 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
I can understand ``pure``.
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/master/std/uni/package.d#L2075
It is literally on the constructor.
I should have noticed this!
On 19/02/2024 5:33 PM, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
On Monday, 19 February 2024 at 01:42:03 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
I can understand ``pure``.
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/master/std/uni/package.d#L2075
It is literally on the constructor.
Now @safe I don't know. My bes
On Monday, 19 February 2024 at 01:42:03 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
I can understand ``pure``.
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/master/std/uni/package.d#L2075
It is literally on the constructor.
Now @safe I don't know. My best guess would be for some reason
the construct
I can understand ``pure``.
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/master/std/uni/package.d#L2075
It is literally on the constructor.
Now @safe I don't know. My best guess would be for some reason the
constructor is getting inferred as it (templates get inferred).
I wanted to construct a CodepointSet from a string, so I used the
constructor here.
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_uni.html#.InversionList.this.2
I wrote a range of pairs (CodepointIntervals) of integers
consisting of each codepoint in the string paired with that plus
one. This did solve the pro
