== Quote from div0 (d...@users.sourceforge.net)'s article
> strtr wrote:
> > Is that different from making all functions within the template final?
>
> Well it delegates the choice of virtual versus non virtual to the class
> using the mixin. No idea if that's a good idea or a bad one; I guess
> yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
strtr wrote:
> == Quote from div0 (d...@users.sourceforge.net)'s article
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>> strtr wrote:
>>> Or more to the point:
>>>
>>> Can (Class) template mixin functions be devirtualized by the compiler or do
== Quote from div0 (d...@users.sourceforge.net)'s article
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> strtr wrote:
> > Or more to the point:
> >
> > Can (Class) template mixin functions be devirtualized by the compiler or do
> > I (as
> > optimization) need to manually copy paste the boile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
strtr wrote:
> Or more to the point:
>
> Can (Class) template mixin functions be devirtualized by the compiler or do I
> (as
> optimization) need to manually copy paste the boiler plate code?
You can just wrap the mixin in a final block:
import std
Or more to the point:
Can (Class) template mixin functions be devirtualized by the compiler or do I
(as
optimization) need to manually copy paste the boiler plate code?
Will template-mixin-functions always be virtual in classes?
"Mixins can add virtual functions to a class"
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/template-mixin.html
related:
http://odefu.blogspot.com/2008/12/composite-oriented-programming.html
