Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Jonathan M Davis
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:20:02 -0400, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > toSimpleString (which toString calls) does give the short version of the > > month > > in it, but during the review process, a number of the folks reviewing > > it were > > against putting code in there relating to printing the

Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Steven Schveighoffer
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:20:02 -0400, Jonathan M Davis wrote: toSimpleString (which toString calls) does give the short version of the month in it, but during the review process, a number of the folks reviewing it were against putting code in there relating to printing the month out as a

Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Jonathan M Davis
> On 04/05/2011 03:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > >> I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are > >> added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like > >> 'SysTime' get added after 2.51? > >> > >> Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a

Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Kai Meyer
On 04/05/2011 03:40 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer wrote: I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like 'SysTime' get added after 2.51? Does anybody have a

Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Jonathan M Davis
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer wrote: > > I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are > > added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like > > 'SysTime' get added after 2.51? > > > > Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a

Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Kai Meyer
On 04/05/2011 03:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like 'SysTime' get added after 2.51? Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string that should w

Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Jonathan M Davis
> I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are > added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like > 'SysTime' get added after 2.51? > > Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string that > should work for me? std.datetime was complete

Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Steven Schveighoffer
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:40:12 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer wrote: I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like 'SysTime' get added after 2.51?

Re: time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Steven Schveighoffer
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer wrote: I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like 'SysTime' get added after 2.51? Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string th

time_t to simple date string conversion

2011-04-05 Thread Kai Meyer
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like 'SysTime' get added after 2.51? Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string that should work for me? -Kai Meyer