Hey guys. Can someone explain me, why this code does only works
with the inline assembler version but not with the mixin?
Thanks in advance!
Code:
import std.stdio : writeln;
import std.conv : to;
template Vala(uint count, alias arr) {
immutable string c = to!string(count);
enum
For clarification: how would that work without mixin + string?
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 14:44:07 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 14:18:58 UTC, Foo wrote:
template Vala(uint count, alias arr) {
immutable string c = to!string(count);
enum Vala = "asm { sub ESP, " ~ c ~ "; mov " ~ arr.stringof ~
",
" ~ c ~ "; mov " ~ arr.stringof ~ "
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 14:46:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
enum Vala(uint count, alias arr) = format("
asm {
sub ESP, %d; // Reserve 'count' bytes
mov %s, %d; // Set a.length = 'count'
mov %s + 4, ESP; // Set &a[0] to reserved bytes
}", count, arr.stringof, cou
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 14:55:00 UTC, Foo wrote:
For clarification: how would that work without mixin + string?
I tried this:
mixin template Vala2(uint count, alias arr) {
asm {
sub ESP, count;
mov arr, count;
mov arr + 4, ESP;
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 15:54:15 UTC, bearophile wrote:
mixin template Vala2(uint count, alias arr) {
What about disallowing "mixin templatename" unless you add
"mixin" before the "template" keyword?
Bye,
bearophile
I do not understand?
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 17:50:10 UTC, Nicolas Sicard wrote:
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 15:02:58 UTC, Foo wrote:
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 14:55:00 UTC, Foo wrote:
For clarification: how would that work without mixin + string?
I tried this:
mixin template Vala2(uint count, alias arr) {
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 20:38:59 UTC, David wrote:
Hi, not too sure if there's still someone reading this post,
but i do have another question. So, I heared so much good stuff
about D, it's powerfull, fast the syntax is nice, but well, why
is D actually not used for common games yet? (I m
On Sunday, 28 September 2014 at 19:11:23 UTC, Jay wrote:
i want to chain 'new' with method calls on the created object.
i found this on the internet:
window.mainWidget = (new Button()).text("Hello
world"d).textColor(0xFF);
it would look much nicer with UFCS:
window.mainWidget = Button.n
Hi,
Could someone explain me, if and how it is possible to allocate a
variable length array with inline assembly?
Somewhat like
int[] arr;
int n = 42;
asm {
// allocate n stack space for arr
}
I know it is dangerous and all that, but I just want it know. ;)
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 10:59:09 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Foo:
Hi,
Could someone explain me, if and how it is possible to
allocate a variable length array with inline assembly?
Somewhat like
int[] arr;
int n = 42;
asm {
// allocate n stack space for arr
}
I know it is dan
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 12:15:23 UTC, uri wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 11:39:43 UTC, Foo wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 10:59:09 UTC, bearophile
wrote:
Foo:
Hi,
Could someone explain me, if and how it is possible to
allocate a variable length array with inline
And it is using malloc... ;)
I wanted something that increases the stack pointer ESP.
e.g.
void main()
{
int[] arr;
int n = 42;
writeln(arr.length);
writeln(arr.ptr);
asm {
mov EAX, n;
mov [arr + 8], ES
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 16:10:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 14:11:32 UTC, Foo wrote:
asm {
mov EAX, n;
mov [arr + 8], ESP;
sub [ESP], EAX;
mov [arr + 0], EAX;
}
but that doe
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 23:06:39 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 16:11:07 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
how can it? compiler doesn't know what the code is supposed to
do. if
compilers will know such things someday, we can stop writing
programs
altogether,
On Friday, 9 January 2015 at 06:18:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Friday, January 09, 2015 00:20:07 Foo via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 23:06:39 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 16:11:07 UTC, ketmar via
> Digit
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 21:00:07 UTC, gedaiu wrote:
Hi,
I implemented Conway's game of life in D. What do you think that
I can improve to this program to take advantage of more D
features?
https://github.com/gedaiu/Game-Of-Life-D
Thanks,
Bogdan
For each remove you create a new array. T
How can I do that without any GC allocation? Nothing in std.file
seems to be marked with @nogc
I'm asking since it seems very complicated to do that with C++,
maybe D is a better choice, then we would probably move our whole
project from C++ to D.
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 at 19:56:37 UTC, FG wrote:
On 2015-02-03 at 20:50, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
Use std.utf.validate instead of decode. It will only allocate
one exception if necessary.
Looks to me like it uses decode internally...
But Foo, do you have to use @nogc? It still looks like
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 at 19:44:49 UTC, FG wrote:
On 2015-02-03 at 19:53, Foo wrote:
How can I do that without any GC allocation? Nothing in
std.file seems to be marked with @nogc
I'm asking since it seems very complicated to do that with
C++, maybe D is a better choice, then we would pr
Since I'm now almost finished, I'm glad to show you my work:
https://github.com/Dgame/m3
You're free to use it or to contribute to it.
On Thursday, 12 February 2015 at 14:44:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 12 February 2015 at 12:52:03 UTC, Andrey Derzhavin
wrote:
If we can't relay on GC wholly, there is no need for GC.
All of the objects, that I can create, I can destroy manually
by myself, without any doubtful GC destroyi
On Thursday, 12 February 2015 at 23:27:51 UTC, Kitt wrote:
I'm currently trying to write a personal Associate Array class
that can be used in @nogc sections. Obviously, this means I'll
want to use malloc/free, however I'm not sure what the
"Correct" way to do this is. In a few places online I'v
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 08:00:43 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 12 February 2015 at 17:29:34 UTC, Foo wrote:
And since today it is @safe wherever possible.
Well, you marked functions @trusted rather indiscriminately :)
Such approach doesn't really improve safety, and the code could
w
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 09:28:30 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 09:11:26 UTC, Foo wrote:
And I wouldn't say indiscriminately. Every function I marked
with @trusted was checked by me so far.
What did you check them for? :)
Just first example: make and destruct, being
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 22:55:27 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Thursday, 12 February 2015 at 23:52:41 UTC, Foo wrote:
This is something I've done recently.
Would be glad if my code will help you:
https://github.com/Dgame/m3
Especially the m3.d module could be useful for you.
/* Class and Str
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 23:13:05 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 23:04:25 UTC, Foo wrote:
Don't understand me wrong. My code is not perfect, but maybe
it can be helpful for someone.
As it is right now, I fear it may do more harm than good.
Always the same in this
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 22:55:27 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Thursday, 12 February 2015 at 23:52:41 UTC, Foo wrote:
This is something I've done recently.
Would be glad if my code will help you:
https://github.com/Dgame/m3
Especially the m3.d module could be useful for you.
/* Class and Str
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 14:39:47 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 13:41:41 UTC, Foo wrote:
Finally, I tried to take your criticism objectively and, as
far as I can tell, I resolved the issues. Is there still any
objections or misconduct?
Nice. I think you fixed
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 06:38:18 UTC, rumbu wrote:
Often I'm using the following code pattern:
class S
{
private SomeType cache;
public SomeType SomeProp() @property
{
if (cache is null)
cache = SomeExpensiveOperation();
return cache;
}
}
Is there any w
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 15:26:28 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:27:13 +, rumbu wrote:
My question was not how I do this, I know already. My question
was if
there is another way to safely call a non-const instance
function on a
const object.
is there a way to been saf
Is this possible?
Example:
void foo(Args...)(auto ref Args args) {
sprintf(str.ptr, fmt.ptr, args);
}
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 at 17:20:23 UTC, Foo wrote:
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 at 17:15:06 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 at 17:09:27 UTC, Foo wrote:
Is this possible?
Example:
void foo(Args...)(auto ref Args args) {
sprintf(str.ptr, fmt.ptr, args);
}
yes
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 at 17:15:06 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 at 17:09:27 UTC, Foo wrote:
Is this possible?
Example:
void foo(Args...)(auto ref Args args) {
sprintf(str.ptr, fmt.ptr, args);
}
yes
I get the error, that I cannot pass a dynamic array to
34 matches
Mail list logo
