[digitalradio] Fixing the 144.39 APRS Network

2005-05-19 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
FYI Andy k3UK Fixing the 144.39 APRS Network http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs/fix14439.html The New n-N Paradigm [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group

[digitalradio] Re: Spam, amusing

2005-05-19 Thread Jerry
Andy, How do these spamers come up with all this stuff that don't make any sense? At least the Viagra and body enhancement messages have slowed down to almost nothing. Jerry The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on t

[digitalradio] Spam, amusing

2005-05-19 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
I weed out about 20 spam messages per day to this group. I thought this one quite amusing FROM: eko@ DATE: Thu, 19 May 2005 23:59:04 +0300 SUBJECT: hello. Hi, My name is Miss Amanda Seko . My hobbies are reading,music,watching of movies.sweeming; and playing of basket ball. I like will

[digitalradio] MT63 part of the Digi Pentathlon

2005-05-19 Thread Vyacheslav-RW3AA
Hello digi op's, 20.05.2005 1800-2400 UTC you have good chance to get more QSO's on this very nice but exotic mode - MT63 working conditions - USB 500Hz long interleave on all (10-160m) bands exclude WARC. Hope to meet you! Full info about Pentathlon and Digital QSO Club membership www.dqso.ne

RE: [digitalradio] Re: pactor II receving

2005-05-19 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
-Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joel Kolstad Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:40 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: pactor II receving [text deleted] > But I am hopeful that eventually we will be seeing

[digitalradio] Re: pactor II receving

2005-05-19 Thread Joel Kolstad
Hi Rickm --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is unlikely that this will be done. The system (both hardware and > software) is proprietary and will probably always remain that way. I agree. > Since you > are unable to have self policing by the r