I am not sure how SCAMP was brought into the discussion, but having been
a beta tester, I can concur that since the mode used the RDFT protocol
like used in Digtrx, the digital SSTV program.
Since amateur radio is a self policing service, I would greatly prefer
that all modes be required to be
Scamp is wide and if your look on your waterfall,
looks like a series of PSK transmissions separated by a couple of hundred
HZ
- Original Message -
From:
John Becker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 5:04
PM
Subject: Re: [digit
Was loud in Oregon as well...
Thanks,
Dave
NK7Z/NNN0RDO
http://www.nk7z.net
If it can't be expressed in figures, it is not science; it is opinion. -
Lazarus Long
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of palmdalesteve
Sent: Sunday, Decemb
I just built an APRS transmitter/locator,
the “PocketTracker”, that transmits GPS signals on 144.39mhz.
It’s a great little device.
Problem is that it doesn’t have
sufficient power to hit digipeaters. I need a small module that will
boost the power from 100mW to 1-2 Watts, any sugge
i checked patricks page, i also have his latest. they are not
implemented.
i sure hope they will soon.
david/wd4kpd
> >
> > will these two modes be available as stand alones or will they be
only
> > for users of mix ?
> >
> > it would not be good to have another mode on the air that is pa
Pactor III has been publicly documented here along with
PSK31, Olivia and the rest:
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/
... Duane N7QDN
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "palmdalesteve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Anyone know if Pactor III is legal here in the US?
>
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't think so.
> It seems to hi in the band for any Pactor operations.
>
> What time (GMT) was this? I'll give a listen.
>
>About two three hours ago, local is call it 15:15 so around 12:00 or
so PST.
It was wide
I don't think so.
It seems to hi in the band for any Pactor operations.
What time (GMT) was this? I'll give a listen.
At 04:58 PM 12/11/05, you wrote:
>Anyone know if Pactor III is legal here in the US?
>
>Was on 20 meters around 14.107 or so and a booming ~2.5 KHz signal
>that could have only b
Anyone know if Pactor III is legal here in the US?
Was on 20 meters around 14.107 or so and a booming ~2.5 KHz signal
that could have only been Pactor III was cranking. Who knows what the
station was doing, gotta have a PTIII decoder program.
By the way, any hope of a Pactor III like decoder for
Interesting reading there Jerry.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM
--
As far as I know, they are only part of MixW
. Are you saying that this isn't good since there is a charge for the software?
Pactor requires some very pricey hardware, much
more than the small charge for MixW. I happily paid the asking price for MixW
since I think
that the authors have
Looking back at my log, have tried to find how many times and the last
time I used some of the modes included in MixW, and some with
MULTIPSK, and CHIP.
AMTOR, 2 contacts, last May 27, 2002.
BPSK31, over 2400 contacts, last December 11, 2005.
BPSK63, maybe 10 contacts, has been a while since last c
Hello Paul,
I'm speaking with Nick (Mixw) about the differences (in the specifications)
between Olivia and Contestia/RTTYM. When I'll issue these modes (after Mixw
will officially issue these ones not before!), I'll add the specifications
in my help file as usual, so they will be public. In all
are the specs published somewhere so they can be added to other programs
(e.g. gMFSK) ?
-ps
obrienaj wrote:
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "David M. Gaytko // WD4KPD"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>will these two modes be available as stand alones or will they be only
>>for users of mi
Hello to all,
I certainly put Contestia and RTTYM on Multipsk, but certainly not all the
possible combinations (40 by mode...thus 3x40=120 with Olivia and 120x2=240
possibilities if we considered the inversion), only the used ones or the
interesting ones ("Le trop est l'ennemi du bien" as we sa
I do not see Contestia or RTTYM in current version of MULTIPSK 3.11.
Some discussion going about all the various modes in the Yahoo
multipsk group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/multipsk/
Quote from Patrick the author of MULTIPSK.
On addition of more buttons for more modes
"Hello Chris, Pat, ON4CC
With the experimenting going on on 160 and 80 by K and VE stations
lately, I wonder if anyone has thought of using ALE to test paths and
then switch to Olivia or Contestia ?
The ALE freqs would be
01 1845000
03 3565000
Maybe the Bubba Net guys may want to try ALE soundings before their net
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "David M. Gaytko // WD4KPD"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> will these two modes be available as stand alones or will they be only
> for users of mix ?
>
> it would not be good to have another mode on the air that is pay only
> like pactor III.
>
> david/wd4k
Had some success around 1808 khz last night with VE6BKB in AB. He was
great copy here. Since I have no 160 antenna and the internal FT-920
tuner is next to worthless, he only copied me when it decided to work.
If I recall, we were using olivia, 1KHZ, 8 or 16 tones, not sure which.
--
73, Craig
will these two modes be available as stand alones or will they be only
for users of mix ?
it would not be good to have another mode on the air that is pay only
like pactor III.
david/wd4kpd
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favor
I was copying KN4LF's CQ 100% even though I couldn"t see or hear his sig
in olivia, I am in Bradford Pa.
I tried 40 W back to him but no joy (2:20 UTC) Amazing!
Ted W3VG
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Ma
21 matches
Mail list logo
