Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK problem

2006-01-09 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Rick, You must have selected the Software mixer option of the mixer menu on the Configuration screen. In that case, the sound card mixer is managed directly by the program, this to adjust the optimum level (Automatic Gain Control). The problem is the diversity of sound card mixers which

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

2006-01-09 Thread williams
Historically, most the NTS traffic was done via CW. It took more than a generation to get acceptance of BPL (Brass Pounder's League) for non CW voice modes. RTTY digital was used some, but I would have to say that it was always a niche area. For those of us who used to be NCS (Net Control

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

2006-01-09 Thread Tim Gorman
The ARRL folks should not be shocked at what has happened. When they negotiate agreements with other agencies (e.g. the American Red Cross) that prevent amateurs from collecting outgoing message traffic at emergency shelters, what do they expect? The ARRL admitted in one of the latest QST's

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

2006-01-09 Thread Danny Douglas
I really wonder if we are thinking in the same terms anymore. It seems to me that hams need to fill in the space where there exists no other communications, much as we have done in the past. Local emergencies such as tornados, floods, landslides etc, knock out local communications from the

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

2006-01-09 Thread Joe Ivey
Danny, You are correct on what you say. I would be willing to bet right now that the local governments do not have any idea of what we can do for them. I belong to a local ARES club here and I know for a fact that even our EMA office does not know what we can provide for them locally.

[digitalradio] Re: NTS and traffic handling and digital

2006-01-09 Thread dshults
Amateur Operators add no value to emergency communications, unless we are able to provide a service where others cannot. I see this as being the focus of any discussion concerning use radio or use Sprint. Why in the world would any Incident Commander hand write a NTS Radiogram for one of those

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

2006-01-09 Thread KV9U
Tim, While I agree with much of what you say, I did not get the same impression from the QST comments about not providing HW traffic. My understanding was that this was a ARC decision so that it would be more fair for everyone since not all shelters had equivalent radio communications

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

2006-01-09 Thread Tim Gorman
I don't want to belabor this too much. I wrote a volume about it to my Director - never heard a single word back from anyone. Just let it be known that if an EMT ever said I'm not going to treat anyone if I can't treat everyone! he would be fired on the spot. The ARC didn't refuse to set up