jeffnjr484 wrote:
> I have a MFJ 1278 multi mode tnc and im in need of a manual I know
> this is a long shot but MFJ no longer has the manuals for this model
> is there anyone out there that can copy the manual or put it on pdf
> file and email it to me. I've heard bad things about this tnc and
Howard White wrote:
> I ran parallel testing a while ago with virtually every interface
> then on the market in trying to discover an interface to standardize
> on for our Emcomm Group.
>
> Two different but indentical computers, in parallel, two different
> interfaces, connected to the same radi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Orville Wayne Cypret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 24, 2006 1:49 PM
Subject: [chip64] Calling CQ Tonight
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be on 7.0775 beginning around 0115Z tonight calling CQ. I'll
stay on freq for a half hour or so. Hope somebody else i
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jeffnjr484" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> I have a MFJ 1278 multi mode tnc and im in need of a manual I know
> this is a long shot but MFJ no longer has the manuals for this model
> is there anyone out there that can copy the manual or put
That sounds great!!
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LAWebsite: www.ky6la.com "No Good Deed Goes
Unpunished""Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
Yes Definitely a significant
difference...
I ran parallel testing a while ago with virtually
every interface then on the market in trying to discover an interface to
standardize on for our Emcomm Group.
Two different but indentical computers, in
parallel, two different interfaces, con
Hello Folks,
I have a MFJ 1278 multi mode tnc and im in need of a manual I know
this is a long shot but MFJ no longer has the manuals for this model
is there anyone out there that can copy the manual or put it on pdf
file and email it to me. I've heard bad things about this tnc and some
good b
Howard,
The issue of internal vs. external sound card is a canard. The only
thing that matters is that the level of receiver generated noise be
sufficiently
higher than the "noise floor" of the sound system to allow the DSP to
function properly. NO sound system, no matter how low the noise
f
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, doc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does ths device provide all of the same features
> as the MixW RigExpert USB?
>
> What are the differences, please?
> http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/3765
Full features and specifications are available at:
www.microHA
> The microHAM DIGI KEYER:
> http://www.microham-USA.com/Products/dk.html
>
> DIGI KEYER is truly "plug and play" with either Windows XP or Apple
> OS 10 ... supports dual receive radios and has the lowest noise floor
> of any device tested other than the > $500 "professional" sound cards.
>
I have had very limited contacts on mode HELL, in fact it was while
experimenting with Andy K3UK and that was it. Last night I received an
email from someone looking to start a Feld Hell group and maybe pique
the interest in this mode. Below is the email I received and how to
contact him if interes
Thanks Andy!
DIGI KEYER integrated codec suppors independent TX and RX sampling
clock rates. Sampling rates are native, no upconversion/downconversion
with decimation/recalculation errors.
Supported TX sampling rates:
32000, 44100 and 48000Hz
Supported RX sampling rates:
8000, 11025, 16000,
On 3/24/06, Dr. Howard S. White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks like MicroHam is finally taking to first step to getting it "Right"
> using an external sound card integrated into the box like they do at
> RigExpert to get away from the Computer generated noise and artifacts of
> internal sound
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> What sample clock rates are supported?
>
> I looked at the web site, but I could not find those details.
>
> If a 48Khz sample clock or better is not directly supported than
this
> device is in the same categ
14 matches
Mail list logo
