Re: [digitalradio] RTTY Contest

2007-09-28 Thread Andrew O'Brien
48 States/Canada: RST + (state/VE area) + CQ Zone All Others: RST + CQ Zone On 9/28/07, Leroy Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could someone give me some pointers on what type of data is sent during > the WWW CQ RTTY contest? I was watching it on the waterfall, and was > decoding fine, b

[digitalradio] Re: center of the waterfall question

2007-09-28 Thread Andrew O'Brien
-and as you move away from the passband "sweet spot", your output power usually decreases.

[digitalradio] RTTY Contest

2007-09-28 Thread Leroy Griffiths
Could someone give me some pointers on what type of data is sent during the WWW CQ RTTY contest? I was watching it on the waterfall, and was decoding fine, but some abbreviations I saw I could not comprehend. Any help? Thanks, Leroy - kb3msu

[digitalradio] Tests in ARQ FAE

2007-09-28 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello to all, I will be QRV for tests to-morrow saturday morning in 14109.5 KHz USB at 10h00 UTC, for the ones interested. I will call CQ in ARQ FAE up to 10h30 UTC. A 4.4.2 Multipsk test version in a ZIP test package is available in my site. It contains the Multipsk test version (with ARQ FAE

[digitalradio] Re: center of the waterfall question

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Bernstein
There are two considerations: 1. the signal being decoded should fall within the receive filter(s) you're using. Some ops activate RTTY or CW filters during PSK QSOs; their choise of offset is thus limited by the positioning of these filters within their receiver's bandpass. 2. the second harm

[digitalradio] RAIN REPORT: The NFCC and Jay Maynard, K5ZC, push for FCC D-STAR Repeater Clarification, Part One

2007-09-28 Thread Mark Thompson
RAIN REPORT: The NFCC and Jay Maynard, K5ZC, push for FCC D-STAR Repeater Clarification (Part One, 13 minutes). http://www.therainreport.com/rainreport_archive/rainreport-9-27-2007.mp3 Shape Yahoo! in

Re: [digitalradio] center of the waterfall question

2007-09-28 Thread Bill Aycock
Frank- I think that there is MUCH confusion in our ranks on this subject. For instance, I set my rig to one frequency (usually 14,070.00) and leave it there. I tune to different signals by moving the "marker" that shows the offset from the base frequency on the waterfall. The radio bandwidth is

[digitalradio] useless qrm

2007-09-28 Thread David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
"It sounds like a ghastly prescription for useless QRM." > > you mean like in contest david/wd4kpd

[digitalradio] RFSM2400 vs. PC-ALE

2007-09-28 Thread Rick
Hi Les, I am not sure how helpful the numbers were, but it does show that you are able to get some packets through, which is good. Does the program offer any kind of relative S/N or other information when it is working? Or can you give us some idea of the conditions and how other modes would h

Re: [digitalradio] OLIVIA 14074

2007-09-28 Thread Claudio Ruben
Ok, gracias por tu respuesta. Intentaremos llamar CQ alrededor de las 1900 z en 14073.65. Ok, thanks for your answer. I will try to call CQ about 1900 z in 14073.65usb Claudio-LU2VCD El día 27/09/07, G. McFarlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > >Hola Claudio, > > ¡Me disculpo por la respuest

Re: [digitalradio] OLIVIA 14074

2007-09-28 Thread G. McFarlin
Ciao Claudio, Funziono molto spesso Olivia e qui sono i modi che "normali" di funzionamento ho trovato per le frequenze differenti: Fra 14072 e 14078 (USB), ho regolato solitamente la manopola 1407x.65 (14072.65, 14073.65, ecc), il programma di Olivia a 500/16 e la frequenza concenta audio (A

Re: [digitalradio] OLIVIA 14074

2007-09-28 Thread G. McFarlin
Hola Claudio, ¡Me disculpo por la respuesta Italiana! Funciono Olivia muy a menudo y aquí soy los modos de funcionamiento "normales" que he encontrado para diversas frecuencias: Entre 14072 y 14078 (USB), fijé generalmente el dial a 1407x.65 (14072.65, 14073.65, al etc), el programa de Olivi

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000]]

2007-09-28 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi all, It was a lot of RFSM2400 activity on 3588 kHz in Europe yesterday. 73 de Steinar LA5VNA Les Keppie skrev: > > > > Hi Rick > Well so far with the testing we are doing on RFSM8000 > it appears to work very well - > below are some transfer figures from the program > using the Non-standar