Re: [digitalradio] signalink

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Raymond Lunsford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Running in digital,seems to recieve with no problems.Only with transmit.USB > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Howard Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Raymond, >> >> You may know this but you did not mention it:

Re: [digitalradio] signalink

Yes,we have been running MT-63 on Navy Mars for 3 or 4 years now very successfully. On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Raymond Lunsford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Raymond Lunsford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Running in digital,seems to recieve with no problems.On

Re: [digitalradio] signalink

OK, if I understand correctly you are receiving MT63 from the other station so your parameters must be the same. One other thing aboutMT63 is that it does not drive the rig very hard. If you double click the speaker icon in your task bar and adjust the Volume and Wave files, that will adjust t

[digitalradio] You Have Mail Re: How Can We Push HF Emcomm Messages to the Field?

The core question still remains: How can we initiate (push) a message to the mobile or portable operator in the field, when the field operator has no expectation that a message will be sent? Or, even more simply, how can we timely notify the field operator "You Have Mail" via HF? During the

Re: [digitalradio] signalink

Running in digital,seems to recieve with no problems.Only with transmit.USB On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Howard Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Raymond, > > You may know this but you did not mention it: > > For MT63, you must be using the same bandwidth, starting audio frequency and > in

Re: [digitalradio] signalink

Hi Raymond, You may know this but you did not mention it: For MT63, you must be using the same bandwidth, starting audio frequency and interleave on both ends. You did not say what program you are using but all programs must have these settings somewhere. BTW, the best MT63 program I have fou

Re: [digitalradio] signalink

Just to be sure...you are aware that there are different mode settings for MT 63, and that not all MT 63s are alike? 73 Mark KQ0I --- Raymond Lunsford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yaesu FT-840.Using cables they sent with the > signalink.Trying to send MT-63. > The system goes into transmit as i

Re: [digitalradio] Re: How Can We Push HF Emcomm Messages to the Field?

"50eroids" should read "50 periods", and "on periods" should read "non periods", fldigit should read fldigi. Sorry - must be the wine - just got back from a family dinner! Skip KH6TY - Original Message - From: "kh6ty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 8:19 PM

Re: [digitalradio] Re: How Can We Push HF Emcomm Messages to the Field?

> > If the signals are in the marginal range, how do you do the coordinating > between the stations? To date, we have been able to use a cell phone. > > How do you calculate the error rate (such as the 6% mentioned)? We send 50eroids.(..). Anything that

Re: [digitalradio] signalink

I'm using the same rig with the signalink and have never had any problem with MT63. John, W0JAB At 06:11 PM 11/27/2008, you wrote: >Yaesu FT-840.Using cables they sent with the signalink.Trying to send MT-63. >The system goes into transmit as it should but the text at the other end is >non- >le

RE: [digitalradio] signalink

Are you running it in digital mode or leaving the radio in USB mode. As well does it receive ok or is that all gibberish as well? Fred VE3FAL -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond Lunsford Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 7:1

Re: [digitalradio] signalink

Yaesu FT-840.Using cables they sent with the signalink.Trying to send MT-63. The system goes into transmit as it should but the text at the other end is non- legible,all mixed up makes no sense all in lower Case,no carriage return,etc. Running about 100 watts. On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Fred

RE: [digitalradio] signalink

I am using 3 of them and have had no problems at all. Please tell us your setup, rigs, cables etc Fred VE3FAL -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond Lunsford Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 4:40 PM To: digitalradio@yahoog

[digitalradio] signalink

Does anyone have experience with a signalink?I can't get mine to transmit clear legible information?

Re: [digitalradio] Re: How Can We Push HF Emcomm Messages to the Field?

Very good information, Skip, If the signals are in the marginal range, how do you do the coordinating between the stations? How do you calculate the error rate (such as the 6% mentioned)? If I understand this correctly, the test was between a 5/8 vertical to quad for vertical polarization vs.

[digitalradio] Re: How Can We Push HF Emcomm Messages to the Field?

Regarding horizontal antennas... they also have a big advantage in rejecting intermod due to being cross-polarized with most commercial services... --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Skip, > > Have you found that DominoEX is the best overall digital mode

Re: [digitalradio] Re: How Can We Push HF Emcomm Messages to the Field?

Hi Rick, > > Have you found that DominoEX is the best overall digital mode for FM? I > know that PSK modes can have doppler errors from aircraft, but otherwise > seem pretty good for weak signal. Yes, definitely! DominoEx is a frequency shift keying mode, not a phase shift mode, but doppler probl