Go to the WARC Bands . . . .
73, KB9Q
no. . . .
73 LA5VNA
S.J. wrote:
Go to the WARC Bands . . . .
73, KB9Q
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rojomn roj...@... wrote:
It does not take up that much of
the band but it does take a lot of the RTTY portion if you are going
to use
that. Some like it and some don't but that is the way it is.
It would be great if this was true, but it seems that
In answer to your questions...
. did not have any luck with a connect from anyone other than local
hams on both 141A and ALE400 , but the bands were in particularly bad shape
over the weekend . Am in the process of installing a 800watt solid state amp
at VE5GPM, so will try that later
I tried to connect again today (this afternoon) as I saw your request
for connecting via FAE400 on 14.111 and 7.103. I tried both stations
callsigns as it almost seemed as if the frequencies were reversed from
the other day with the regular MIL-STD-188-141A mode, but maybe I
misread that, HI.
John Bradley wrote:
· Have given up on the PCALE and HFlink bunch, since there
seems to be no interest in doing anything other than sending 1 line
messages to each other , or simply sounding. The MARS version of PCALE
might work, but the author is not allowing use of this software
