A quick review of the results shows just 9 North American entrants out
of 163 non-EA entries. Does this simply reflect the band conditions
or illustrate a lack of interest in PSK as a contest mode ?
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:07 AM, EA4ZB wrote:
>
>
> The results of the EA PSK31 CONTE
Hi Andy,
Let me know what you would like, I'll pass suggestions to Claudio. Maybe
other logbook writes would like to integrate with HRDLog.net - it's quite
easy.
My original idea was simply a web-based logbook status thingy...
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Messag
*The results of the EA PSK31 CONTEST are already published.
You can view them with the following link:
http://www.ure.es/concursos/23-ea-psk31/1303--resultados-concurso-ea-psk31-ano-2009.html
Congratulations to the winners.
Joaquin EA4ZB
Contest Manager*
While myself, Sholto, and others have put a lot of time in to developing
spotting pages and sked pages to help the digital mode users find QSO
opportunities ( see http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/or
http://www.hamspots.net/ ) I wonder if the methods behind HRDLOG NET are
perhaps the best ?
Agree. QRO RTTY contesting is a plague.
LA5VNA Steinar
Jaak Hohensee wrote:
> The DigiQRP viewpoint other.
> 1. The RTTY is discrimination mode, not for QRP. We need something
> other for contests.
> 2. MFSK16 is good compromise with pic-capability.
>
> more info http://www.edutee.net/digiqrp
The DigiQRP viewpoint other.
1. The RTTY is discrimination mode, not for QRP. We need something other
for contests.
2. MFSK16 is good compromise with pic-capability.
more info http://www.edutee.net/digiqrp
Test results: PathSim Tab, below pdf-file
Jaak
es1hj/qrp
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
With